Behavioral Systems Architecture — since 2009

60% passive members. 18% turnover. Neither is a people problem.

Loyalty programmes, onboarding flows, employee performance: wherever people behave differently than expected, the cause is rarely the people. Engaginglab diagnoses where the system sends the wrong signals, builds the capacity to change that, and measures what has changed twelve months later.

Start system check Services & pricing →
Avg 58%
passive members in a typical loyalty programme before intervention
6–9×
higher annual revenue from active vs. passive members
< 5%
typical cost share of measurable value created
16 yrs
system diagnostics and behavioral design
Loyalty & Customer Retention

What is sitting on the table without acquiring a single new customer?

A loyalty programme with 500,000 members and a 42% activation rate has 290,000 passive members. At an average annual revenue that runs seven times higher for active members than passive ones, this programme is leaving a nine-figure sum on the table it could capture without acquiring a single new member.

This is not an extreme example. It is an average programme. The cause, in most cases, is not the offer. It is the signals the programme sends: what it rewards, when it communicates, which behaviour it suggests as the next action.

People & Performance

What does turnover cost that was avoidable?

At an organisation of 400 employees, 16% turnover and an average annual salary of € 55,000, 64 people leave each year. Cost per departure at 1.5 times annual salary: around € 82,500. Total annual cost: over € 5 million.

A 25% reduction in structurally driven turnover through behavioral redesign corresponds to annual savings of over € 1.3 million. The Behavioral Systems Project investment is defined after the assessment.

The assessment sets the baseline. After twelve months, we calculate together. Anyone who cannot say after that time what has changed has not conducted a behavioral intervention. They have delivered a workshop.

Measure the baseline →
The actual problem

It's called behavioral misfit. And it costs more than you think.

Your organisation wants innovation, ownership and loyalty. But your system rewards compliance, attendance and safety. That dissonance is not a leadership problem. It is a design problem. And it has a name.

01

Rewards don't solve the problem

Steering behaviour with incentives does not build engagement. It erodes trust.

02

Engagement programmes fizzle out

Short-term measures address symptoms. The system remains unchanged, and so do the results.

03

Behaviour is designable

Build the system correctly and the right behaviour becomes easier than the wrong. That is not luck. That is architecture.

The Drive Method

Not chance. Architecture.

A structured process that makes behavioural gaps visible and closes them systematically, from diagnosis to permanent anchoring in the organisation.

01

Diagnosis

Measuring the gap between desired behaviour and the actual signals the system sends.

02

Fit

Selecting the right tools based on the Behavioral Solution Matrix.

03

Architecture

Constructing the IntrinsiQ Performance Loop: Curiosity, Mastery, Progress.

04

Enablement

Training your teams to run the system independently and scale it themselves.

05

Management

Embedding in KPIs, dashboards and governance for lasting effectiveness.

Free System Check
Does your system have a behavioral misfit?

Name a specific behaviour from your organisation and answer 20 automatically adapted questions. The result is a complete Diagnostic Report in under twelve minutes. A first concrete look at your system before you decide whether to go deeper.

Start system check
free  ·  under 12 minutes

No score, no three-point PDF. A complete Diagnostic Report: gap analysis, intervention sequence, roadmap, objection cards for internal communication.

View sample report →
03 / Objection Cards
"Our employees need direct oversight."
The data shows: control produces compliance, not commitment. When people understand how their performance contributes to meaningful outcomes, they continue the behaviour without supervision.
Why control undermines intrinsic motivation
How to address these objections in your next presentation
Which data you need for decisions at leadership level
02 / Action Plan
30/60/90-Day Roadmap
Weeks 1–2Identify and eliminate supervision-dependent triggers
Week 3Document structural contradictions in the system
Month 2Connect behaviour to meaningful outcomes
Month 2Build feedback loops that make competence visible
Month 3Measure and calibrate self-sustaining engagement
01 / Gap Analysis
Moderate Misfit
Actual
External Regulation
"I do it because I have to."
Required
Identified
"I do it because it matters to me."
Structural Signals
Flag D — System-Reality GapOK
Flag C — Motivation ErosionOK
Flag S — Contradictory Signals!
Investment

What it costs, and what for.

A loyalty programme that gains 8 percentage points of activation rate through behavioral redesign generates, for 400,000 members at € 180 average annual revenue per active member, around € 5.8 million in additional value. The Behavioral Systems Assessment costs € 8,500. That is 0.15% of the value it calculates.

Assessment
Behavioral Systems Assessment
The gap gets a number.
€ 8,500
net · plus VAT
8–12 working days

A guided diagnostic session with Roman Rackwitz. Complete report with Behavioral Misfit Index, gap analysis, intervention sequence, roadmap, and the number that justifies the assessment: what the identified misfit costs your organisation.

Fee fully credited towards a subsequent engagement. Condition: engagement commissioned within 90 days of delivery.
Request assessment →
Residence
Behavioral Architect in Residence
Assessment, implementation and capability transfer in one engagement.
from € 5,500 / month
net · plus VAT
minimum 6 · recommended 12 months
What the engagement includes
✓Behavioral Systems Assessment (value € 8,500, fully included)
✓Scope-based implementation work throughout the engagement
✓Inhouse capability transfer: your teams learn to apply behavioral design independently
✓Strategic advisory, audits and ongoing system corrections

The decisive difference from Assessment and Project: at the end of the engagement, the capability stays in your organisation. Not as documentation, but as lived competence within your own teams.

Six months anchors the methodology. Twelve months makes the capacity productive. The engagement ends. The capability does not.
Discuss fit →
Project
Behavioral Systems Project
Diagnosis and implementation in one engagement.
Scope-based
Investment defined after assessment
typically 3–6 months · € 25,000–70,000

Complete system diagnosis combined with design, implementation and anchoring of the behavioural architecture. The specific investment follows from what the assessment shows, because the depth of the intervention depends on the depth of the diagnosis.

For loyalty programmes, HR transformations and platform products where the misfit is systemically embedded.
Request a call →
Training

Internal capability instead of external dependency.

The goal of a consulting engagement is not only that something changes, but that the organisation can continue to move forward under its own power. That works precisely when people internally are able to diagnose behaviour, design systems, and integrate this thinking into their daily work.

What makes change lasting is not the quality of the solution, but the environment in which people work afterwards, because the brain is a social calibration system that orients itself by what counts as normal in its surroundings.

The Behavioral Architects Masterclass is the environment in which this internal capacity develops: a year-long programme for HR professionals, leaders and consultants who want to anchor behavioral design not just as knowledge, but as a permanent way of thinking.

behavioral-architects.com →
The Drive Method – Roman Rackwitz
The Book

The handbook for the architecture.

Roman Rackwitz decodes in "The Drive Method" the mechanisms of sustainable performance. No myths, no motivational speeches, just architecture.

How to build engagement that survives even when external rewards disappear. A practical book for those who want to design systems rather than symptoms.

Order your hard copy Download book as PDF →
Client voices

What clients say about working together.

"Engaginglab gave us the decisive ideas around the gamification of our business model at a critical stage of development. I am very grateful."

Carsten SudhoffCEO CircularSociety & Chairman sqiyo AG

"Roman knows gamification inside out, back to front and upside down. It is clear that he lives it."

Nick TyrellCEO Osney Media

"Through targeted questions and his relaxed manner, Roman succeeded in bringing all participants up to speed and arriving at comprehensible results."

Daniel Wanschalöm JankeTechnical Co-Founder BRIVE

Trusted by, among others

Frequently asked

What you want to know before we speak.

Most questions arise not from scepticism, but from the desire to make the right move at the right time. Here are the most common ones, including the uncomfortable ones.

Almost always with the Behavioral Systems Assessment. Not because it is a cheap entry point into something more expensive, but because the depth of every subsequent engagement depends on what the assessment reveals. There are two paths after: the Behavioral Architect in Residence for organisations that want to build a lasting capacity, and the Behavioral Systems Project for organisations that want to close an identified gap within a defined timeframe. In both cases the assessment fee is fully credited. Anyone who already knows they need a long-term behavioural architecture can start directly with the retainer, without a prior assessment.
Because it is not a survey. The assessment is a guided diagnostic session with Roman Rackwitz personally, which activates, structures and translates the systemic knowledge within your organisation into a complete report containing the Behavioral Misfit Index, a gap analysis per examined behaviour, BSM positioning maps, a prioritised intervention sequence and an executive summary for the leadership level. Above all, it contains a number: what the identified gap costs your organisation, and what a functioning system would be worth. For a loyalty programme with 400,000 members that gains 8 percentage points of activation rate through behavioral redesign, that is around € 5.8 million at € 180 annual revenue per active member. The assessment costs € 8,500. The ratio speaks for itself.
The Behavioral Systems Assessment runs over 8 to 12 working days in total. The operational effort on your side consists of a guided diagnostic session of approximately 3 hours with the leadership team, plus brief preparation beforehand. The Behavioral Systems Project typically runs 3 to 6 months, with an investment typically between € 25,000 and € 70,000 depending on scope and organisational size, defined after the assessment. The Behavioral Architect in Residence adapts to the organisational rhythm and requires no fixed time block; the recommended term of 12 months follows from the fact that methodology anchoring and productive capacity are two distinct phases.
It means that your own teams are capable, after the engagement, of diagnosing behavioural problems independently and designing behavioural interventions independently. Concretely: your HR team identifies a behavioral misfit in the onboarding flow without external help. Your loyalty team identifies which programme mechanic is sending the wrong signals and which intervention should take priority. This happens not through a report someone leaves behind, but through knowledge transfer, structured collaboration on real problems and the gradual handover of diagnostic and design tasks. Anyone who still needs Engaginglab for every intervention after the engagement is not a success case.
Yes. If an engagement is commissioned within 90 days of report delivery, the assessment fee is fully credited. The assessment is not a gateway for an upsell logic, but a standalone deliverable. Whether further collaboration follows is determined solely by what the report shows.
The Behavioral Architect in Residence is the right format for organisations that do not want to solve a single problem, but want to build the lasting capacity to identify and design behavioural problems independently. It is not an ongoing service to be consumed, but a function that is gradually shifted from outside to inside. Right for: organisations that regularly make new behavioral design decisions, whether loyalty mechanics, onboarding flows or incentive structures, and who do not want or cannot create a dedicated full-time role for this. The minimum term of 6 months is enough to anchor the methodology. 12 months to make the capacity productive.
Yes. The assessment does not measure whether you are actively investing in engagement, but whether your system is sending the right signals. Running programmes can be part of the diagnostic picture, and frequently this is precisely where the core of the problem appears: the measures are well-intentioned, but the system around them remains unchanged, so the measures dissipate or even produce the opposite effect. The assessment makes this contradiction visible and provides a clear assessment of whether the running programme should be repaired or fundamentally reconceived.
Contact

Setting the baseline.

Whether loyalty programme, employee performance or onboarding flow: the conversation always begins with a concrete behavioural requirement from your organisation, not with an offer.

Book a call directly

roman@engaginglab.com